It is currently Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:44 am



Welcome
Welcome to Australian MSTS Workshops.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you access to view most discussions. By joining the Australian MSTS Workshops forum, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls and Download MSTS addon content that is not available to non members.
Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please register and Join the Australian MSTS Workshops Forum today!


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 35
Location: Clutching a "Do-it-Yourself" Beetroot.
supergoods wrote:
Chrome_Bullet wrote:
Can confirm that they were always right hand drive - even when rebuilt with larger boiler and as simple engines.


Russ,

Do you have the larger boiler dimensions?
Hi supergoods,

The dimensions for the new V class boiler were pretty much the same as when built.

Only the spec changed with the replacement of the original steam dome with a similar type as used on the (then) brand new A2 locomotives. The original 'pop' type safety valves were also replaced with the Ramsbottom type, sitting atop the outer firebox crown sheet, just forward of the cab. The safe working pressure of the boiler was also raised to 180PSI with the new boilers, hence larger capacity.

Hope this helps

L.

_________________
The WHITE ZONE is for loading, and un-loading only. Go to the WHITE ZONE - You'll love it. It's a way of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:50 pm
Posts: 738
Location: Brisbane
You mean lowered as the original pressure was 200psi and when they were rebuilt as simples it was lowered to 180 as to keep the tractive effort similar.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 35
Location: Clutching a "Do-it-Yourself" Beetroot.
Mrdriver wrote:
You mean lowered as the original pressure was 200psi and when they were rebuilt as simples it was lowered to 180 as to keep the tractive effort similar.
Indeed you are correct, Russ!

It shows that you have been reading the pages I sent you from "The Bible" more than I have!

That'll teach me! :shock:

_________________
The WHITE ZONE is for loading, and un-loading only. Go to the WHITE ZONE - You'll love it. It's a way of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:04 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:50 pm
Posts: 738
Location: Brisbane
Ahh Chromie I am but just an amateur that is correct sometimes. :shock:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 35
Location: Clutching a "Do-it-Yourself" Beetroot.
Indeed. The pressure drop was certainly as there was no longer 2 small diametre high pressure cylinders to feed. Being a normal simple engine with larger diametre cylinders doesn't require as much pressure for the same results.

Anyway.

Cop these screenies!

Image
V499 crosses Taradale Viaduct with a Race Special to Melbourne.

Image
Two red V's with a short roadside goods on Malmsbury Viaduct. The second V was attached as a loco balancing movement.

Image
The same train on the Up side of Malmsbury Viaduct.


The V's certainly are a nice engine to drive, and should be a part of all VR MSTS users' loco roster upon release from the Workshops - sensational loco.

_________________
The WHITE ZONE is for loading, and un-loading only. Go to the WHITE ZONE - You'll love it. It's a way of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 31
wonder why they werent left hand drive? it would be real difficult driving a left hand train on right hand railways .. harder than it is driving left hand cars on right hadn roads


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 9:48 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Sugar Land Texas
Probably because that was the Baldwin Standard and LHD would have been extra cost, the same with the Phoenix Foundry built batch, build off the Baldwin drawings without unecessary changes.

In UK there was, right up the end of steam a mix of RHD & LHD locos although the final standard was LHD very few locos were converted. The only large conversions were the early LNER A3 Pacifics which were RHD were converted to LHD.

Each railway company had its own standards and sighted its signals accordingly.

If a loco which was driven from the different side to that which the signals were sighted, there could be problems and the fire man needed to sight the more difficult signals for the driver.

The J & A Brown ROD 2-8-0's are also RHD

_________________
Ian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 10:56 pm
Posts: 45
Remember that any loco travelling tender first is being driven from the "wrong" side.

Drivers therefore had plenty experience of it and he would know where he needed the fireman's assistance for sighting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 35
Location: Clutching a "Do-it-Yourself" Beetroot.
supergoods wrote:
Probably because that was the Baldwin Standard and LHD would have been extra cost, the same with the Phoenix Foundry built batch, build off the Baldwin drawings without unecessary changes.

In UK there was, right up the end of steam a mix of RHD & LHD locos although the final standard was LHD very few locos were converted. The only large conversions were the early LNER A3 Pacifics which were RHD were converted to LHD.

Each railway company had its own standards and sighted its signals accordingly.

If a loco which was driven from the different side to that which the signals were sighted, there could be problems and the fire man needed to sight the more difficult signals for the driver.

The J & A Brown ROD 2-8-0's are also RHD
Correct there, supergoods.

I have just looked at copies of the general arrangement diagrams for the W and S class locos that were built by Baldwin, and later copied by Phoenix Foundary in Ballarat. The diagrams' show that the W and S class were right-hand driven. The nA's are also right-hand drive, and oddly enough, so were/are the two narrow gauge G class Garratt locomotives built by Beyer-Peacock. I should imagine that the two early D class 4-4-0's built by Rogers of New Jersey, USA, most likely also followed American practice of being driven from the right.

As far as I am aware these, and the V class were the only VR steam locomotives to be right-hand driven.

_________________
The WHITE ZONE is for loading, and un-loading only. Go to the WHITE ZONE - You'll love it. It's a way of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:24 am
Posts: 89
I was looking at the plans for them about an hour ago, had I known I could have checked.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 9:48 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Sugar Land Texas
Chrome_Bullet wrote:
The nA's are also right-hand drive, and oddly enough, so were/are the two narrow gauge G class Garratt locomotives built by Beyer-Peacock.


Building the Garrats as RHD makes sense as all the Na's were RHD and they operated on isolated systems together.

I doubt any more designs for narrow gauge steam locos were even considered

_________________
Ian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:19 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:50 pm
Posts: 738
Location: Brisbane
Now released in the steam locomotive section.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:04 pm
Posts: 488
Location: Dubbo,NSW
Hi Russell,
Thanks for sharing these nice locos and the wagon pack with us.
Great work.
Regards Geoff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:50 pm
Posts: 738
Location: Brisbane
Thanks Geoff it took a while but the end result was worth it.
But bad that it has had 30 odd downloads but only one thanks though! :(

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:52 pm
Posts: 10
Great work Russell, the level of work on the V class and the horse wagons along with the old explosive van is amazing :) , attention to detail on the models is superb :D

Keep up the hard work :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 8:21 pm
Posts: 16
Hi Russell,
Thanks for another first rate model of your typical high quality of workmanship.
These models are much appreciated
Thanks again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:10 pm
Posts: 6
Many thanks for releasing a less than common loco, it's a great pleasure to be simming outside the square! 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:33 am
Posts: 3
hello, im just wondering if these locos are in any way related to QR's c17s because they look remarkably similar


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:24 am
Posts: 89
Negative.

In Chrome Bullet's absence - the V class was a pretty standard Baldwin design; the C17 was I'm pretty sure a homegrown QR design.

They were built for two separate companies in two different eras.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:25 pm
Posts: 52
ninthnotch wrote:
Negative.

In Chrome Bullet's absence - the V class was a pretty standard Baldwin design; the C17 was I'm pretty sure a homegrown QR design.

They were built for two separate companies in two different eras.


I'd go so far to say that, if there is any loco the VR V resembles in any way, it's the NSWGR 'Big J' J(483) 2-8-0s. My uneducated opinion from looking at various photos and such says to me that the boiler is pitched higher on the J, among other things, but the rolling chassis and tender are almost identical.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:24 am
Posts: 89
Showing my utter pig-ignorance of NSWGR steam; they were also Baldwins? Were they something like a 23 class or some such later on?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:06 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:12 am
Posts: 177
Location: Five minutes walk from the High Level Bridge
Notch, the Big J was the 29 class, little J's were the 28 class, and the real J's were Victorian.

_________________
Mr Anderson... Surprised to see me?
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:25 pm
Posts: 52
Chris Anderson wrote:
Notch, the Big J was the 29 class, little J's were the 28 class, and the real J's were Victorian.


Some of the little J's (colloquially known as the 'Native Bears' as they were locally built) were built to similar design to the imported Little J's but numbered amongst the X10 series. The mechanical particulars were similar but they differed in external detail. Interestingly the local products were built with Baldwin design tenders.

The Bergs model of the 29 (Big J) in final form:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:25 pm
Posts: 52
ninthnotch wrote:
Were they something like a 23 class or some such later on?


The 29 is, in essence, the freight version of the 23. Much like the Ps and Ts (32s and 50s), in fact they were ordered to compare the types. Some authors (and some NSWGR correspondence, in a roundabout way) suggest that the Baldwin locos were actually better performers, however political forces of the time (tied in with an accident blamed on the 23, but a track problem was the reality) demanded the British locos be built in greater numbers. Oddly enough, a batch of 20(?) 32s were built by Baldwin. The 23s were well-liked out West, where post-accident they were banished, due to the fully compensated running gear.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: